Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 17:17
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What are the biggest challenges in training multimodal AI models?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Have you worn a tight black mini skirt?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
The Law Firms That Appeased Trump—and Angered Their Clients - WSJ
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Do you think cheating is that bad?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why electricity prices are surging for U.S. households - MSN
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Quantum Time-Freeze: Lasers Lock Quantum States 1,000x Longer - SciTechDaily
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Astronomers discover most powerful cosmic explosions since the Big Bang - Live Science